search

FirstSpot (FAQ), is a Windows-based WLAN Access Server designed to track and secure a public Wi-Fi network in a centralized way. Based on captive portal technology, FirstSpot allows users to login only utilizing a web browser.

Other, centrally managed Community LAN software include Sputnik and the popular Community LAN software NoCat which operates fairly autonomously on individual nodes.

FirstSpot Features:

  • Browser-based login, no extra client required
  • Exception free web site support (can handle wildcard sub-domain name format. e.g. *.yahoo.com)
  • Browser-based Administration
  • Efficient idle timeout mechanism
  • Instant keyword support (i.e. type “logout” in browser to bring up logout windows)
  • Time-limited pre-paid account support
  • Usage tracking
  • Backend integration with ODBC
  • work with Ethernet based network as well as WLAN
  • Support MTU (Multi-Tenant Units) environment
  • PocketPC Support * *planned

It works with a PC and 2 network cards, Windows 2000, SQL Server 2000 or other ODBC compliant Data Source. FirstSpot provides an unlimited user license but is coy on pricing. No independent reviews (yet).

Another community LAN management system was announced by Wificom Technologies, which is teaming with Colubris Networks to deliver integrated public wireless LAN solutions to service providers worldwide.

Wificom’s SAB Server integrates service creation, billing, rating, roaming, customer care, reporting, device independent content delivery as well as value-added location-based services. With the joint solution, service providers will centrally manage hotspot services provided through Colubris Networks access devices.

City-wide communications management packages can include Integrated Justice System Projects and first-responder enhancements:

Is your county government smart enough to provide interoperable voice and data using Wi-Fi networking? Maybe not.

Mobile data services will go down in an emergency. That’s because most depend on GPRS or CDPD (which itself is going away). Homeland security bucks, instead, will be spent on $2,500 radios.

It’s probably a mistake. Cities pay millions of dollars every year to cellular operators for voice and data communications. But police-type radios are less risky, politically, than installing a Wi-Fi infrastructure. Managers would get too much flack if they experimented with Wi-Fi. It IS a tough situation for managers.

But safety has nothing to do with it.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.