search

Verizon Chairman and CEO Ivan Seidenberg last week told the San Francisco Chronicle that city plans to build networks could be one of the dumbest ideas I’ve ever heard.

But backers of municipal networks are fighting hard against such claims, reports Telephony Magazine. They are winning the support of a high-tech community worried that Asia and now much of Western Europe is pulling ahead of the U.S. with better broadband penetration, quality and cost.

We’re a joke compared to Europe and most of Asia, said economist John Rutledge, the author of last summer’s U.S. Chamber of Commerce report on the need for telecom regulatory reform. In the U.S., most people think of broadband as a cable modem that’s like turtle mail in Japan and Korea, where broadband services typically run at 20 Mb/s and higher at costs similar to what U.S. consumers pay for 3 Mb/s service, he added.

Meanwhile, the Los Angeles WiFi Cloud Committee Report (pdf) included academics as well as incumbent telco and cable company representatives.

Executive Summary

VISION:
We envision the City of Los Angeles as a place where everyone who works, lives or visits here enjoys convenient and affordable broadband access to the Internet. We want Los Angeles to be a broadband city both in reality and in global reputation.

We think that the experience of increasingly mobile, high speed, personalized communication will help make the City a great place to live, work and enjoy the excitement of urban life. Most importantly, we believe the ability for everyone to communicate easily and quickly is vital to the City s aspiration to serve as a great forum of open and free democratic discussion and creative expression.

In developing our report, the members of the panel agreed on several core values that guided our deliberations and recommendations:

Affordability. High speed communication services need to be available at prices competitive with other cities and regions in the U.S. not just to help close the Digital Divide within the City, but to avoid any negative impact on the decision to locate in Los Angeles or even in one area of the City vs. another by individuals, non-profits or businesses.

Convenience. Access to high speed networks should be available to all City residents, businesses and visitors in ways and at locations that encourage their use and enhance the experience of living in a modern, connected metropolis.

Technological Neutrality. The rapid changes in communication technologies that will occur over the next five years requires that the City not attempt to lock in on any one technological solution nor attempt to award preferred status to any particular solution for fast and easy access to the Net.

“One of the best ways for a city the size of Los Angeles to achieve our goal”, says the report, “is to work with institutions in the private sector that share our vision and want to work in partnership with the City to achieve it”.

  • The Digital Cities Convention in Philadelphia will welcome, technology professionals from some 33 cities as well as counties, states and municipal coalitions, from May 2-4, 2005.

    Sponsored by the Wireless Internet Institute, the convention promises to provide three days of brainstorming, analysis and consensus-building among representatives of wireless and mesh networking providers and the city, state and international representatives interested in implementing their solutions.

  • BostonWAG is one of several local organizations involved in a special task force formed to plan the Boston WiFi Summit, which will be held on Thursday, May 19. The task force is now seeking input from community residents on how they think wireless technology could be used to make Boston a more attractive place to live, work, go to school and conduct business. Representatives of local community groups, grassroots organizations, and non-profit agencies are invited to participate in the forum. The Summit is being organized and sponsored by the City of Boston, the Boston Councillor John M. Tobin, Jr., the Boston Foundation, and the Museum of Science.

  • Chicago’s Finance and Economic Development committees estimate it would cost about $18.5 million to deploy the network, according to the Chicago Tribune. A task force will study the best way to deploy a city-wide wireless network. In addition, an alderman said he would propose a law that would preserve the city’s right to install such a network, even if the state legislature approves a bill that would prevent municipal networks.

  • New York City has an RFP for a billion dollar cloud, but New Yorkers suffer from patchy mobile coverage. In exchange for being able to mount up to 18,000 new lamp post-based antennas, to strengthen coverage around the five boroughs, the companies will pay the city government around $25m each year.

    State Outcome
    Colorado Amended version much less onerous
    Florida Compromise reached
    Illinois Died in committee
    Indiana Died in committee
    Iowa Some restrictions lifted, still pending
    Louisiana Pending
    Michigan Pending
    Nebraska Five measures pending
    Ohio Session ended, no action
    Oregon No action
    Texas Amended version less restrictive, still pending
    Virginia Died in committee
    West Virginia Died in committee
    Source: The Ballet-Herbst Law Group

    Business 2.0 looked at Broadband Boomtowns in the Northeast, Southeast, Mid West and West.

    WiFi Planet has the latest Hot Spot Hits. MuniWireless covers city clouds while Civitium keeps score on municipal broadband legislation. See DailyWireless; GigE to the Home - Wireless Next? and DailyWireless Testifies for Muni Broadband.

    These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Facebook
    • Google
    • StumbleUpon
    • Technorati
  • Something to say?

    You must be logged in to post a comment.