search
Om Malik, along with C/Net and CNN, report that TiVo is incorporating context-sensitive advertising via the key word search mechanism:

From Skip Ads, to Pop-Up Ads to now keyword specific ads…. TiVo is slowly becoming the new advertising platform, which is to say, new bottle old wine. Still if capitalism can thrive in China, then why not ads on TiVo.

The Wall Street Journal reports (free link) that the DVR maker is working with three big media-buyers Interpublic Media, OMD and Starcom Media Vest Group and others like Comcast Spotlight ad-sales division on a new way to deliver ads to consumers, who are looking for a specific product.
In other words its Adwords for Television. Type in BMW and commercials will appear in a special folder right next to saved television programs.
Unlike Google, TiVo charges a subscription service, and the main reason people are happy to pay is “time shifting television” and skipping through ads.
And Google doesn’t make you buy a device. Make the service free and then TiVo and its customers are on equal footing.
Direct Response Television Advertising works with long form advertising. Bowflex uses it successfully.
Would stuffing a “free” TiVo with 40 hours of advertising pencil out? (See DailyWireless: The Free Triple Play) A WiMax connection could deliver targeted advertising and VOD movies as well as VoIP.
Isn’t that what Qwest wants? Isn’t that what Microsoft wants?
The Walled Prison of phone, cable and cellular won’t let competitors in but WiMax tears down those walls.
Killing SBC and Verizon by combining satellite, WiMax and TiVo might be anyone’s game. You don’t have to be a media giant to knock them off. It’s marketing.
Terry Heaton says “Broadcasting is an industry in deep trouble, and it will take innovation and integrity to save it from a real disaster.” The Long Tail expressed the numbers in percentage terms.
(Note: some of these companies, such as Gannett and the New York Times company, are primarily in the newspaper business, although they also own some TV stations.
  • Belo (BLC): -11.6%
  • Emmis (EMS): +8.7%
  • Fisher (FSCI): -3.1%
  • Gannett (GCI): -24.2%
  • Gray (GTN): -38%
  • Hearst-Argyle (HTV): -6.9%
  • Media General (MEG): -17%
  • Meredith (MDP): -2.4%
  • New York Times (NYT): -30.7%
  • Sinclair (SBGI): +29.1%
  • Tribune (TRB): -24.8%
  • Young (YBTVA): -80.2%
These media properties averaged a loss of 16.8% over the last 12 months while the Dow gained 4%.
Networks are trying; Disney is experimenting with iTunes, NBC is promoting 99 cent on demand programming in limited markets, AOL and Time/Warner are preparing the launch of Internet TV for oldies, and CBS is in talks with Google and Yahoo.
Newspapers are in trouble, too.
The average weekday circulation at U.S. newspapers fell 2.6 percent in the six month-period ending this September. Here are the figures for the 20 biggest U.S. newspapers, as reported by the Audit Bureau of Circulations.
  1. USA Today, 2,296,335, down 0.59 per cent
  2. The Wall Street Journal, 2,083,660, down 1.10 per cent
  3. The New York Times, 1,126,190, up 0.46 per cent
  4. Los Angeles Times, 843,432, down 3.79 per cent
  5. New York Daily News, 688,584, down 3.70 per cent
  6. The Washington Post, 678,779, down 4.09 per cent
  7. New York Post, 662,681, down 1.74 per cent
  8. Chicago Tribune, 586,122, down 2.47 per cent
  9. Houston Chronicle, 521,419, down 6.01 per cent
  10. The Boston Globe, 414,225, down 8.25 per cent
  11. The Arizona Republic, 411,043, down 0.54 per cent
  12. The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J. , 400,092, up 0.01 per cent
  13. San Francisco Chronicle, 391,681, down 16.4 per cent
  14. Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, 374,528, down 0.26 per cent
  15. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 362,426, down 8.73 per cent
  16. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 357,679, down 3.16 per cent
  17. Detroit Free Press, 341,248, down 2.18 per cent
  18. The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, 339,055, down 4.46 per cent
  19. The Oregonian, Portland, 333,515, down 1.24 per cent
  20. The San Diego Union-Tribune, 314,279, down 6.24 per cent.

We’re not ready to show or describe our service in any detail; we’re still in development. Our goal is to create a platform to organize the world’s news using the best of technology, community, and editors. We see an explosion of interest in and coverage of news from incredibly varied sources around the world and see a need around that.

Last year U.S. advertising spending was an estimated $300 billion to $400 billion. Just $10 billion of that was spent online, even less than for ads in the Yellow Pages.
By contrast, newspaper and direct telephone markets were worth $50 billion and $90 billion, respectively. Broadcast television advertising is a $100 billion market.
Yet, according to Forrester Research, households now spend at least 30% of their media time online, while the Internet has just 5% of total ad spending.
That situation won’t last for long.
Business 2.0 says with nearly 38 million broadband connections in the United States, consumers now spend three hours a day online compared with 1.7 hours watching television, according to a Stanford University study. Forrester predicts greater than 12 percent annual growth in Web ad spending between now and 2010.
Pop Quiz: How much do U.S. kids ages 3-17 spend on items for their personal use and entertainment each year? Hint: The World is Flat (mp3).
The media world faces an interim of chaos, opines Bob Garfield (MP-3). Network television and cable audiences are down. The Internet and a host of other new technologies are emerging…and marketers are shifting their dollars accordingly.

Yesiree, by George, it’s a brave and exciting new world that the near future holds, a democratized, consumer-empowered, bottom-up, pull-not-push, lean forward and lean back universe that will improve the quantity and quality of entertainment options, create hitherto unimaginable marketing opportunities and efficiencies and, not incidentally, generate wealth that will make the current $250 billion domestic ad market seem like pin money.

[But the future]– near or not — doesn’t happen until…later.
Because revolutions by their nature are neither seamless nor smooth.
Because there is no reason to believe the collapse of the old media model will yield a plug-and-play new one.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.