search


“I will bring the whole edifice down on their unworthy heads.”
- Richard Burton in The Medusa Touch


Congress will consider the question of net neutrality
Feb. 7 in the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, as it attempts to update telecommunications laws, last updated in 1996. Telco critics are trying to maintain the equal access provisions.
Two telecom reform bills have been introduced that include net neutrality principles, but neither would prevent the kind of “walled garden” approach that telcos want, say industry observers. Light Reading says no existing laws define the responsibilities of the network operators with regard to carriage of competing IP services.
Currently Google video and Vonage depend on “best efforts” of telcos and cable companies when you pay your $40/month internet access bill. But RBOCs are pushing their own IP voice and video services. They say they want to provide a better quality of service (QOS) for their own applications. On Jan. 6, 2008, Verizon sheds the requirement to comply with “network neutrality” (for twisted pair). Same deal with ATT/SBC. Fiber plant may have different rules - telcos own it and run it. They control the horizontal. Thank the Supreme Court for that.
BellSouth might require a QOS “tier” to access Google Video (even if you’re paying for 5 Mbps service). Three of the four U.S. RBOCs — BellSouth, Verizon and AT&T have made public statements in favor of that approach.
SBC CEO Ed Whitacre said that allowing competing video content run unfettered over SBC networks is “nuts”. “We have to figure out who pays for this bigger and bigger IP network,” said Whitacre. “If someone wants to transmit a high quality service with no interruptions and ‘guaranteed this, guaranteed that’, they should be willing to pay for that,” he said.

Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg said during his Consumer Electronics Show keynote: “We have to make sure they [services] don’t sit on our network and chew up our capacity.”

BellSouth CEO Duane Ackerman acknowledged the benefits of unique content but seemed to favor a mix of proprietary and non-proprietary offerings. “Unique content is going to be important, but taking this world…and making it easy for a mass market to do what they want to do when they want to do it is going to have a great deal of value.”

The phone companies’ networks that carry Net traffic around the U.S. are much like the highway system, explains Vint Cerf, who wrote that they may begin setting up the equivalent of tollbooths and express lanes, potentially discriminating against the traffic of other companies. Such moves, Cerf warned, “would do great damage to the Internet as we know it.”

AT&T/SBC and Verizon/MCI now own the choke points — controlling much of the long distance fiber networks in the United States. They intend to use it.Don’t look to Kevin Martin for leadership. It was Michael Copps, a Democrat, not Martin, who held up the SBC/AT&T merger to require “network neutrality”. But that “network neutrality” provision only lasts 3 years. “Our open and vibrant and freewheeling Internet is to me the last place on earth where we should tolerate gatekeeper control,” Copps said.

“The short term enforcement of network neutrality, and the absence of similar enforcement mechanisms for other telephone and cable companies, means that Internet service providers and applications developers can be undermined by anticompetitive practices of network owners.”

EarthLink’s Internet phone provides competition. Telcos don’t want it. They got muniwireless banned in some states through sycophantic legislators. Maybe they’ll do time behind their own “walled prison”.

Look. Different people have different points of view. But the case for muni networks just gets stronger.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.